Some believe that it is good for a country’s culture to import films and TV programmes, while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Answer:

Today we live in the era where the globalization has long been driving the world. As a result, one school of thought holds that it is beneficial for a culture of the particular country to watch foreign movies and TV channels, whilst others believe that people would be better off sticking to domestic ones. The aim of this essay is to analyze both views before providing my own opinion.

On the one hand, it is wildly beneficial for people to import foreign media products. The main reason behind this view is that international television programs are one of the best sources of keeping track of what is currently happening around the globe which could, otherwise, be unavailable in domestic channels. Take an example of BBC channel of the USA, which is aired 24 hours a day, enabling people of any country to access the very channel at their convenience to be aware of up-to-the-minute news, thus contributing to the cultural diversity into the bargain. Therefore, it makes sense to watch TV programs made overseas to explore more about the foreign cultures.

On the other hand, there are some plausible counters to this argument. Obviously, by producing local movies and TV programs, citizens of a country would be able to acquire knowledge about their own culture as many long-standing traditions could be vividly conveyed in cinemas and on the media. As this shows, it is the local media products that have been keeping the age-old traditions of different nations alive.

Finally, there are some crucial, yet unnoticed factors. If a large number of foreign films were imported, this would run the risk of spoiling the cultural value. This is due chiefly to the mass of products in the foreign cinematography which may contain some offensive or violent scenes that could be somewhat incongruous for either culture or religion of local people. Thus, it is clear why many disapprove of foreign films, hence choosing domestic ones.

In conclusion, although both views provide valid reasons for their arguments, I firmly believe that it is better for people to have their national TV channels and films, which can improve people’s cultural understanding and do not contain any displays of abuse.

Comments/Feedback:

Why “the ” globalisation? TA – “one school of thought holds that it is beneficial for a culture of the particular country to watch foreign movies and TV channels, “Really? isn’t just commercialism? Your introduction is very ‘formulaic’ so 9 is out of reach. Your answer is very general and the weighting you give to the news drifts away from the heart of the question (BBC = British Broadcasting Corporation!). There’s a lack of “relevant examples” throughout. You make the usual fatal error of not clearly explaining your viewpoint. Whose opinion are you expressing in para 2, 3 & 4? How does the reader know?// CC – good in every respect but is para 2 a paragraph?// LR – ” wildly beneficial”? “unnoticed factors”?// G – one sentence might be overlong.clumsy

So, I’d say: TA – 6

//CC – 7

//LR – 8

// G – 9

//Overall = 7.5